<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 748 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125183</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the condonation of delay application, stay, and appeal in a case concerning a 286-day delay in filing an appeal. The applicant&#039;s argument that the person responsible for filing the appeal had resigned before the impugned order was passed was deemed insufficient cause for the delay. The Tribunal emphasized the need to establish a valid reason for exceeding the normal period of limitation for filing an appeal under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act. The decision highlighted the importance of meeting statutory timelines and demonstrating genuine justifications for delays in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 13:11:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162104" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 748 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125183</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the condonation of delay application, stay, and appeal in a case concerning a 286-day delay in filing an appeal. The applicant&#039;s argument that the person responsible for filing the appeal had resigned before the impugned order was passed was deemed insufficient cause for the delay. The Tribunal emphasized the need to establish a valid reason for exceeding the normal period of limitation for filing an appeal under Section 35B of the Central Excise Act. The decision highlighted the importance of meeting statutory timelines and demonstrating genuine justifications for delays in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>