<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 747 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125182</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) order on the valuation of fabrics but set aside the classification decision, directing the quantification of duty demand and redetermination of redemption fine and penalty. The Revenue&#039;s appeal and the Respondents&#039; cross-objection were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 13:07:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162103" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 747 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125182</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals) order on the valuation of fabrics but set aside the classification decision, directing the quantification of duty demand and redetermination of redemption fine and penalty. The Revenue&#039;s appeal and the Respondents&#039; cross-objection were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125182</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>