<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 823 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125179</link>
    <description>Cotton polyester and viscose polyester slivers arising in manufacture were examined on the question whether they were excisable and marketable for duty purposes. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own matter, which had relied on the Bombay High Court ruling in Grentex &amp; Co. v. Union of India on the same issue. Applying that binding and earlier view, it found no basis to depart from the settled position and set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals with consequential relief, if any.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:50:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162100" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 823 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125179</link>
      <description>Cotton polyester and viscose polyester slivers arising in manufacture were examined on the question whether they were excisable and marketable for duty purposes. The Tribunal followed its earlier decision in the assessee&#039;s own matter, which had relied on the Bombay High Court ruling in Grentex &amp; Co. v. Union of India on the same issue. Applying that binding and earlier view, it found no basis to depart from the settled position and set aside the impugned order, allowing the appeals with consequential relief, if any.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>