<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 533 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125176</link>
    <description>Press mud arising in sugar manufacture was treated as waste and held to be non-excisable, so it did not qualify as an exempted final product for Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002/2004. Because the rule applies only where common inputs are used in manufacturing final products, that requirement was not met where the material was merely waste later used to make vermi compost. The demand, penalty and interest were therefore not sustainable, and the duty demand was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 533 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125176</link>
      <description>Press mud arising in sugar manufacture was treated as waste and held to be non-excisable, so it did not qualify as an exempted final product for Rule 6(3)(b) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002/2004. Because the rule applies only where common inputs are used in manufacturing final products, that requirement was not met where the material was merely waste later used to make vermi compost. The demand, penalty and interest were therefore not sustainable, and the duty demand was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125176</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>