<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 614 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125171</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, upheld the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai&#039;s decision to confiscate excess raw materials imported duty-free and deny exemption claimed under specific notifications. The judgment demanded recovery of customs duty foregone and imposed penalties on the company and individuals. However, the Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalties pending appeal disposal, finding that the applicants had validly availed exemptions and complied with licensing conditions, in alignment with a Supreme Court judgment. The case was directed for regular hearing due to significant revenue involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 12:04:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 614 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125171</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, upheld the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai&#039;s decision to confiscate excess raw materials imported duty-free and deny exemption claimed under specific notifications. The judgment demanded recovery of customs duty foregone and imposed penalties on the company and individuals. However, the Tribunal granted a waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalties pending appeal disposal, finding that the applicants had validly availed exemptions and complied with licensing conditions, in alignment with a Supreme Court judgment. The case was directed for regular hearing due to significant revenue involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>