<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 1018 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125165</link>
    <description>Amended Rule 9A of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002, read with Notification No. 40/2003-C.E. (N.T.) and the Board circular dated 30-4-2003, allowed one-time Cenvat credit on inputs lying in stock as on 1-4-2003. The operative test was the existence of stock on the relevant transitional date, not the date on which the supplier or trader dispatched the goods. The objection that the fabrics were not duty paid when removed from the supplier&#039;s premises was also unsupported by material. On that construction, the credit was admissible and could be retained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 11:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162086" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 1018 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125165</link>
      <description>Amended Rule 9A of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002, read with Notification No. 40/2003-C.E. (N.T.) and the Board circular dated 30-4-2003, allowed one-time Cenvat credit on inputs lying in stock as on 1-4-2003. The operative test was the existence of stock on the relevant transitional date, not the date on which the supplier or trader dispatched the goods. The objection that the fabrics were not duty paid when removed from the supplier&#039;s premises was also unsupported by material. On that construction, the credit was admissible and could be retained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125165</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>