<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 590 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125148</link>
    <description>The appellate authority rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning the retrospective application of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules 2002. The case clarified that the rule could not be enforced retrospectively if it was not in effect at the time of the relevant actions. The judgment emphasized adherence to the legal framework in force during the events in question, leading to the affirmation of the appellate authority&#039;s ruling in favor of the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2012 10:22:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 590 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125148</link>
      <description>The appellate authority rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal concerning the retrospective application of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules 2002. The case clarified that the rule could not be enforced retrospectively if it was not in effect at the time of the relevant actions. The judgment emphasized adherence to the legal framework in force during the events in question, leading to the affirmation of the appellate authority&#039;s ruling in favor of the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>