https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125139 The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal's decision on including transit insurance charges in the assessable value, directing the appellant to deposit the confirmed duty amount. The Tribunal dispensed with the pre-deposit condition for the balance duty amount, allowing deduction on discounts to customers. However, the Tribunal did not grant an unconditional stay petition, emphasizing compliance with deposit requirements. The appellant was directed to comply with the deposit within the specified timeframe, with a follow-up hearing scheduled for assessment. en-us Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:28:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125139 The Supreme Court upheld the Tribunal's decision on including transit insurance charges in the assessable value, directing the appellant to deposit the confirmed duty amount. The Tribunal dispensed with the pre-deposit condition for the balance duty amount, allowing deduction on discounts to customers. However, the Tribunal did not grant an unconditional stay petition, emphasizing compliance with deposit requirements. The appellant was directed to comply with the deposit within the specified timeframe, with a follow-up hearing scheduled for assessment. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 02 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125139