<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 518 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125129</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the valuation enhancement and duty demand due to the appellant&#039;s knowing undervaluation of imported goods. The confiscation of goods was justified, but considering the appellant&#039;s lack of experience in importing, the redemption fine and penalty were reduced to Rs. 1,50,000 and Rs. 25,000, respectively. The decision struck a balance between acknowledging the circumstances and upholding legal principles on valuation and duty payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 17:35:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 518 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125129</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the valuation enhancement and duty demand due to the appellant&#039;s knowing undervaluation of imported goods. The confiscation of goods was justified, but considering the appellant&#039;s lack of experience in importing, the redemption fine and penalty were reduced to Rs. 1,50,000 and Rs. 25,000, respectively. The decision struck a balance between acknowledging the circumstances and upholding legal principles on valuation and duty payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125129</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>