<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 511 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125122</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision allowing credit of Rs. 1,00,533 to the respondent despite the loss of duty paying documents. Verification confirmed the duty paid nature of the goods, and the lower authorities exercised discretion to condone procedural lapses. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere, emphasizing the receipt of goods and duty paid character were undisputed. The Department&#039;s appeal was rejected, and the matter concluded with the judgment pronounced in open court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:53:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 511 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125122</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision allowing credit of Rs. 1,00,533 to the respondent despite the loss of duty paying documents. Verification confirmed the duty paid nature of the goods, and the lower authorities exercised discretion to condone procedural lapses. The Tribunal found no reason to interfere, emphasizing the receipt of goods and duty paid character were undisputed. The Department&#039;s appeal was rejected, and the matter concluded with the judgment pronounced in open court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125122</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>