<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 510 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125121</link>
    <description>The Tribunal, considering the appellant&#039;s contentions and the significant revenue involved, waived the pre-deposit requirement during the appeal regarding the classification of goods for duty liability. Despite acknowledging the time-barred nature of the proceedings, the Tribunal focused on evasion allegations and granted liberty for early hearing applications due to substantial revenue implications. The appellant&#039;s modus operandi of utilizing a job worker for assembling TV components led to allegations of evasion through misclassification, which were contested by the appellant citing relevant judgments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:52:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162042" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 510 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125121</link>
      <description>The Tribunal, considering the appellant&#039;s contentions and the significant revenue involved, waived the pre-deposit requirement during the appeal regarding the classification of goods for duty liability. Despite acknowledging the time-barred nature of the proceedings, the Tribunal focused on evasion allegations and granted liberty for early hearing applications due to substantial revenue implications. The appellant&#039;s modus operandi of utilizing a job worker for assembling TV components led to allegations of evasion through misclassification, which were contested by the appellant citing relevant judgments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125121</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>