<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 492 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125109</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of refund for excess duty paid on imported goods by M/s. Erbis Engineering Limited. Erbis failed to prove that the excess duty had not been passed on to buyers as required by Section 28C of the Customs Act. The sales invoice did not clearly indicate the duty element, and the appellant&#039;s documents did not demonstrate the burden had not been passed on. The Tribunal considered legal provisions under Sections 28C, 28D, and 27 of the Customs Act, ultimately dismissing Erbis&#039; appeal on 30-10-2008.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:56:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 492 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125109</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of refund for excess duty paid on imported goods by M/s. Erbis Engineering Limited. Erbis failed to prove that the excess duty had not been passed on to buyers as required by Section 28C of the Customs Act. The sales invoice did not clearly indicate the duty element, and the appellant&#039;s documents did not demonstrate the burden had not been passed on. The Tribunal considered legal provisions under Sections 28C, 28D, and 27 of the Customs Act, ultimately dismissing Erbis&#039; appeal on 30-10-2008.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125109</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>