<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 488 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125105</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, dismissed the appeal challenging a remand order by the Commissioner (Appeals) post-amendment in Section 128A(3) of the Customs Act. The Tribunal held that the appellate authority retains the jurisdiction to remand a case, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Union of India v. Umesh Dhaimode. The Tribunal emphasized the binding nature of Supreme Court decisions on all courts and authorities, rejecting arguments based on differing High Court opinions. The Tribunal did not delve into the case&#039;s merits, focusing solely on the jurisdictional issue and ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:42:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=162028" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 488 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125105</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, dismissed the appeal challenging a remand order by the Commissioner (Appeals) post-amendment in Section 128A(3) of the Customs Act. The Tribunal held that the appellate authority retains the jurisdiction to remand a case, citing the Supreme Court&#039;s decision in Union of India v. Umesh Dhaimode. The Tribunal emphasized the binding nature of Supreme Court decisions on all courts and authorities, rejecting arguments based on differing High Court opinions. The Tribunal did not delve into the case&#039;s merits, focusing solely on the jurisdictional issue and ultimately dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>