https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125101 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging the order of the Commissioner (A) that vacated the confiscation of excisable goods and penalties imposed on the assessee firm and its partner. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of strict compliance with legal provisions, including the requirement for proper authorization for filing appeals before the Tribunal. The appeal was deemed not maintainable due to the lack of valid authorization as mandated by Section 35B(2), highlighting the significance of adhering to procedural requirements in excise law matters. en-us Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Oct 2012 15:24:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125101 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI dismissed the Revenue's appeal challenging the order of the Commissioner (A) that vacated the confiscation of excisable goods and penalties imposed on the assessee firm and its partner. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of strict compliance with legal provisions, including the requirement for proper authorization for filing appeals before the Tribunal. The appeal was deemed not maintainable due to the lack of valid authorization as mandated by Section 35B(2), highlighting the significance of adhering to procedural requirements in excise law matters. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125101