https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125093 The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) in a case concerning the excisability and marketability of a chemical solution used in a photographic laboratory. The Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) had upheld duty liability on the appellant, but the Tribunal found the order to be non-speaking as it did not address the appellant's submissions. The Tribunal directed a fresh consideration with a personal hearing for the appellant, setting aside the previous order for review. en-us Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Oct 2012 14:09:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125093 The Tribunal remanded the matter back to the Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) in a case concerning the excisability and marketability of a chemical solution used in a photographic laboratory. The Ld. Commissioner (Appeals) had upheld duty liability on the appellant, but the Tribunal found the order to be non-speaking as it did not address the appellant's submissions. The Tribunal directed a fresh consideration with a personal hearing for the appellant, setting aside the previous order for review. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125093