https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125084 The Tribunal dismissed the appeals in C/344 & 345/2008 due to substantial delays in filing, with one set delayed by 275 days and the other by 90 days. The appellants' reasons for delay, including health issues and reliance on another party, were deemed insufficient. Lack of medical evidence and unreasonable beliefs led to the rejection of condonation of delay applications and subsequent dismissal of the appeals as time-barred. The importance of providing credible reasons for seeking condonation of delay was emphasized, with unsupported claims leading to the unfavorable outcome for the appellants. en-us Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Oct 2012 13:07:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125084 The Tribunal dismissed the appeals in C/344 & 345/2008 due to substantial delays in filing, with one set delayed by 275 days and the other by 90 days. The appellants' reasons for delay, including health issues and reliance on another party, were deemed insufficient. Lack of medical evidence and unreasonable beliefs led to the rejection of condonation of delay applications and subsequent dismissal of the appeals as time-barred. The importance of providing credible reasons for seeking condonation of delay was emphasized, with unsupported claims leading to the unfavorable outcome for the appellants. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125084