https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125079 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to reduce the penalty imposed under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The absence of evidence supporting clandestine removal led to the rejection of the Revenue's appeal, affirming the decision to reduce the penalty to Rs. 10,000. en-us Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:49:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125079 The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) to reduce the penalty imposed under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 read with Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The absence of evidence supporting clandestine removal led to the rejection of the Revenue's appeal, affirming the decision to reduce the penalty to Rs. 10,000. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 24 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125079