<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 780 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125070</link>
    <description>Rubberised nylon tyre cord fabrics were treated as classifiable under Chapter Heading 59.06, with the order relying on Supreme Court authority already settling that classification. The goods were not accepted as non-excisable, and the Tribunal declined to keep marketability open for future disputes because it confined itself to the issues in the appeal. On that classification basis, Additional Excise Duty was held not leviable, while the quantified Basic Excise Duty demand was sustained and the challenge to duty confirmation and exemption denial failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 12:03:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161994" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 780 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125070</link>
      <description>Rubberised nylon tyre cord fabrics were treated as classifiable under Chapter Heading 59.06, with the order relying on Supreme Court authority already settling that classification. The goods were not accepted as non-excisable, and the Tribunal declined to keep marketability open for future disputes because it confined itself to the issues in the appeal. On that classification basis, Additional Excise Duty was held not leviable, while the quantified Basic Excise Duty demand was sustained and the challenge to duty confirmation and exemption denial failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125070</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>