https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125066 The appellant was found entitled to Cenvat credit on damaged inputs as they were used in the manufacturing process despite claiming insurance on them. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that there was no suppression of facts or intention to evade duty. The appeal was allowed, and the demands for reversal of credit or payment of duty for the damaged inputs were dismissed. en-us Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:34:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125066 The appellant was found entitled to Cenvat credit on damaged inputs as they were used in the manufacturing process despite claiming insurance on them. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that there was no suppression of facts or intention to evade duty. The appeal was allowed, and the demands for reversal of credit or payment of duty for the damaged inputs were dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125066