<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 775 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125065</link>
    <description>Interim protection against recovery may be granted pending consideration of a stay application where the appellant seeks to rely on additional technical evidence. The Tribunal noted that such evidence cannot be introduced without giving the revenue an opportunity to object, and directed the appellant to file the miscellaneous application in the prescribed manner. Recovery proceedings were ordered not to be pursued until the stay application was heard. The operative effect was that interim relief was available, but only subject to proper filing and consideration of the applications concerning additional evidence and stay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 11:33:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161989" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 775 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125065</link>
      <description>Interim protection against recovery may be granted pending consideration of a stay application where the appellant seeks to rely on additional technical evidence. The Tribunal noted that such evidence cannot be introduced without giving the revenue an opportunity to object, and directed the appellant to file the miscellaneous application in the prescribed manner. Recovery proceedings were ordered not to be pursued until the stay application was heard. The operative effect was that interim relief was available, but only subject to proper filing and consideration of the applications concerning additional evidence and stay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125065</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>