<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 773 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125063</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, ordering payment of interest on the refunded amount beyond three months from the CESTAT order date. However, the claim for interest on interest was denied as there is no provision for it in the Customs Act. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on unjust enrichment, stating it did not apply since the duty was paid after the Adjudication order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 11:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 773 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125063</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, ordering payment of interest on the refunded amount beyond three months from the CESTAT order date. However, the claim for interest on interest was denied as there is no provision for it in the Customs Act. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on unjust enrichment, stating it did not apply since the duty was paid after the Adjudication order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>