https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125056 The judgment addressed a misrepresentation in the cause title of an application, where the appellant and respondent were inaccurately stated. It was found that the cause title was mistakenly altered, and the stenographer was held responsible for the error. The court directed the correction of the cause title to accurately reflect 'M/s. ETCO Telecom Ltd.' as the appellant and 'Commissioner of Customs, Amritsar' as the respondent. This correction aimed to uphold the integrity of legal documentation by ensuring the proper identification of parties involved in the case. en-us Wed, 06 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 19 Oct 2012 10:40:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125056 The judgment addressed a misrepresentation in the cause title of an application, where the appellant and respondent were inaccurately stated. It was found that the cause title was mistakenly altered, and the stenographer was held responsible for the error. The court directed the correction of the cause title to accurately reflect 'M/s. ETCO Telecom Ltd.' as the appellant and 'Commissioner of Customs, Amritsar' as the respondent. This correction aimed to uphold the integrity of legal documentation by ensuring the proper identification of parties involved in the case. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 06 May 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125056