<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 568 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125054</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal due to a prior decision on the issue in the assessee&#039;s appeal. The lack of coordination in tagging appeals for hearing and communication regarding the pendency of Revenue&#039;s appeal led to procedural difficulties. The Tribunal directed the CDR to address these issues to enhance procedural efficiency. The judgment emphasized the importance of proper communication and procedural diligence in the appellate process for effective adjudication and upholding principles of justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2013 10:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 568 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125054</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal due to a prior decision on the issue in the assessee&#039;s appeal. The lack of coordination in tagging appeals for hearing and communication regarding the pendency of Revenue&#039;s appeal led to procedural difficulties. The Tribunal directed the CDR to address these issues to enhance procedural efficiency. The judgment emphasized the importance of proper communication and procedural diligence in the appellate process for effective adjudication and upholding principles of justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125054</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>