https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125051 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, addressed the non-appearance of the Appellant's representative despite the matter being listed for hearing. The Tribunal excused the representative for the first instance but warned against future non-compliance. A four-week extension was granted for compliance, emphasizing the importance of adhering to court orders and effective communication with the court. The directive for the representative to inform the client about the deadline aimed to prevent further prejudice to the litigant. The judgment underscores the Tribunal's commitment to procedural fairness and protecting litigants from the consequences of representative misconduct. en-us Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Apr 2013 18:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125051 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, addressed the non-appearance of the Appellant's representative despite the matter being listed for hearing. The Tribunal excused the representative for the first instance but warned against future non-compliance. A four-week extension was granted for compliance, emphasizing the importance of adhering to court orders and effective communication with the court. The directive for the representative to inform the client about the deadline aimed to prevent further prejudice to the litigant. The judgment underscores the Tribunal's commitment to procedural fairness and protecting litigants from the consequences of representative misconduct. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125051