https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125050 Repeated requests for adjournment on the ground that counsel was out of station were treated as insufficient where no alternative arrangement was made to assist disposal of the matter. The Tribunal noted the history of repeated adjournments, found the explanation unsatisfactory, and held that the request reflected an attempt to delay proceedings. The adjournment application was refused and, because the appellant failed to proceed with the matter, the case was dismissed for non-prosecution. en-us Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Apr 2013 10:59:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125050 Repeated requests for adjournment on the ground that counsel was out of station were treated as insufficient where no alternative arrangement was made to assist disposal of the matter. The Tribunal noted the history of repeated adjournments, found the explanation unsatisfactory, and held that the request reflected an attempt to delay proceedings. The adjournment application was refused and, because the appellant failed to proceed with the matter, the case was dismissed for non-prosecution. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125050