<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 522 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125044</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi highlighted the lack of representation for the appellant in a case where despite counsel&#039;s name in the cause list, no representation was made. Emphasizing the necessity of proper representation, the tribunal directed the registry to ensure thorough examination of case records before presentation. Additionally, the tribunal addressed a procedural defect in the counsel&#039;s engagement, emphasizing the importance of properly executed legal documents. Concerned with compliance, the tribunal instructed the registry to explain oversights and stressed adherence to legal procedures, scheduling a hearing for further clarification on 16th April, 2009.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 14:01:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 522 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125044</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi highlighted the lack of representation for the appellant in a case where despite counsel&#039;s name in the cause list, no representation was made. Emphasizing the necessity of proper representation, the tribunal directed the registry to ensure thorough examination of case records before presentation. Additionally, the tribunal addressed a procedural defect in the counsel&#039;s engagement, emphasizing the importance of properly executed legal documents. Concerned with compliance, the tribunal instructed the registry to explain oversights and stressed adherence to legal procedures, scheduling a hearing for further clarification on 16th April, 2009.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125044</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>