<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (2) TMI 521 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125043</link>
    <description>A strong prima facie case for interim relief was found where duty had been confirmed on the view that the imported antenna sub-system did not qualify as an antenna for exemption under Notification No. 25/2005-Cus. The appellant relied on product literature and on the treatment of similar imports under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus., which supported its claim for exemption. On that basis, waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was granted and recovery was stayed pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:50:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (2) TMI 521 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125043</link>
      <description>A strong prima facie case for interim relief was found where duty had been confirmed on the view that the imported antenna sub-system did not qualify as an antenna for exemption under Notification No. 25/2005-Cus. The appellant relied on product literature and on the treatment of similar imports under Notification No. 21/2002-Cus., which supported its claim for exemption. On that basis, waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty was granted and recovery was stayed pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125043</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>