<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 584 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125038</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the application for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of duty and penalty amounts. The decision was based on the unique circumstances of the case where the goods were sold on a principal-to-principal basis, differentiating it from cases involving physician samples. The Tribunal found that the goods in question were actually sold by the appellant to other manufacturing units under the latter&#039;s brand name, aligning with a precedent cited by the appellant&#039;s counsel. This led to a favorable outcome for the appellant due to the inapplicability of the Board&#039;s circular and the High Court&#039;s judgment to the specific facts of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 13:26:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 584 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125038</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the application for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery in respect of duty and penalty amounts. The decision was based on the unique circumstances of the case where the goods were sold on a principal-to-principal basis, differentiating it from cases involving physician samples. The Tribunal found that the goods in question were actually sold by the appellant to other manufacturing units under the latter&#039;s brand name, aligning with a precedent cited by the appellant&#039;s counsel. This led to a favorable outcome for the appellant due to the inapplicability of the Board&#039;s circular and the High Court&#039;s judgment to the specific facts of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>