<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 580 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125034</link>
    <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal due to the appellant&#039;s non-compliance with the deposit order under Section 129E of the Customs Act. Despite multiple extensions granted, the appellant failed to deposit the required amount within the specified deadlines, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lack of adherence to legal provisions and previous orders. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely compliance with legal requirements in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:53:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161962" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 580 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125034</link>
      <description>The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal due to the appellant&#039;s non-compliance with the deposit order under Section 129E of the Customs Act. Despite multiple extensions granted, the appellant failed to deposit the required amount within the specified deadlines, leading to the dismissal of the appeal for lack of adherence to legal provisions and previous orders. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of timely compliance with legal requirements in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125034</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>