https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125020 The Commissioner set aside the original authority's decision, leading to a conflict in the classification of goods for availing credit. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed as the disputed goods were identified as integral parts of capital goods, and their eligibility for credit was upheld based on their association with capital goods like reverse osmosis system and glass line reactor. The judgment emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between goods for determining their classification under the relevant rules. en-us Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 Oct 2012 11:47:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125020 The Commissioner set aside the original authority's decision, leading to a conflict in the classification of goods for availing credit. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed as the disputed goods were identified as integral parts of capital goods, and their eligibility for credit was upheld based on their association with capital goods like reverse osmosis system and glass line reactor. The judgment emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between goods for determining their classification under the relevant rules. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125020