<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 499 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125012</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi allowed the appeals by the appellant challenging the Commissioner&#039;s orders enhancing the declared values of imported Hooks and Loops. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the need to adhere to established principles when rejecting declared values and considering actual import prices for similar goods. It was held that comparing prices of goods of different varieties and from different countries was impermissible, and the enhanced price accepted by the Department could not be considered the transaction value for comparison. Consequently, the Commissioner&#039;s orders enhancing the assessable value were not upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2017 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 499 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125012</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi allowed the appeals by the appellant challenging the Commissioner&#039;s orders enhancing the declared values of imported Hooks and Loops. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, emphasizing the need to adhere to established principles when rejecting declared values and considering actual import prices for similar goods. It was held that comparing prices of goods of different varieties and from different countries was impermissible, and the enhanced price accepted by the Department could not be considered the transaction value for comparison. Consequently, the Commissioner&#039;s orders enhancing the assessable value were not upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>