<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 470 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125007</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the decisions of the lower authorities and dismissed the appeal regarding the claim for interest on Modvat credit reversal and re-credit. It was concluded that the government was not obligated to compensate the appellants with interest payment as there was no evidence of coercion during the reversal and re-credit process. The tribunal emphasized the absence of statutory support for the claim under Section 11AA and the voluntary nature of the actions taken by the appellants, leading to the rejection of their request for interest payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:19:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161937" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 470 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125007</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the decisions of the lower authorities and dismissed the appeal regarding the claim for interest on Modvat credit reversal and re-credit. It was concluded that the government was not obligated to compensate the appellants with interest payment as there was no evidence of coercion during the reversal and re-credit process. The tribunal emphasized the absence of statutory support for the claim under Section 11AA and the voluntary nature of the actions taken by the appellants, leading to the rejection of their request for interest payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=125007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>