<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 454 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124991</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision that duty on fatty acid produced during job work for refined oil was not payable by the respondents. The Commissioner (Appeals) ruled that the duty liability for both refined oil and fatty acid rested with Balaji Oil Industries, not the appellants. The Tribunal found no fault in this decision, affirming that the duty on fatty acid was discharged through the duty paid on the refined vegetable oil.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:24:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 454 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124991</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision that duty on fatty acid produced during job work for refined oil was not payable by the respondents. The Commissioner (Appeals) ruled that the duty liability for both refined oil and fatty acid rested with Balaji Oil Industries, not the appellants. The Tribunal found no fault in this decision, affirming that the duty on fatty acid was discharged through the duty paid on the refined vegetable oil.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124991</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>