<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 447 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124984</link>
    <description>The judgment dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s ruling in favor of the importer. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to prescribed rules for determining the origin of goods and accepted the certificate of origin issued by the designated agency, ultimately finding no justification to reject it.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 17:38:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 447 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124984</link>
      <description>The judgment dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s ruling in favor of the importer. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to prescribed rules for determining the origin of goods and accepted the certificate of origin issued by the designated agency, ultimately finding no justification to reject it.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>