<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 767 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124975</link>
    <description>The Tribunal addressed the denial of Modvat credit of duty to the applicant based on supplementary invoices. The appeal filed by Unit No. 1 was set aside, impacting Modvat credit for Unit No. 2. Unit No. 1 was entitled to relief of duty paid, affecting the Modvat credit for Unit No. 2. No penalty was imposed due to the absence of the assessee. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, rejecting the Modvat credit. The judgment disposed of the ROM application, clarifying the denial of credit, relief entitlement, and penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:57:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161907" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 767 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124975</link>
      <description>The Tribunal addressed the denial of Modvat credit of duty to the applicant based on supplementary invoices. The appeal filed by Unit No. 1 was set aside, impacting Modvat credit for Unit No. 2. Unit No. 1 was entitled to relief of duty paid, affecting the Modvat credit for Unit No. 2. No penalty was imposed due to the absence of the assessee. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was allowed, rejecting the Modvat credit. The judgment disposed of the ROM application, clarifying the denial of credit, relief entitlement, and penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>