<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 764 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124972</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the original stay order directing the deposit of Rs. 4 crores, emphasizing compliance with court directives. The appellant&#039;s modification application was rejected for being untimely and lacking merit, as the issue raised was not part of the current proceedings or raised at earlier stages. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for non-compliance with the stay order and the High Court&#039;s directive, reinforcing the importance of adhering to court orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 16:44:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161904" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 764 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124972</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the original stay order directing the deposit of Rs. 4 crores, emphasizing compliance with court directives. The appellant&#039;s modification application was rejected for being untimely and lacking merit, as the issue raised was not part of the current proceedings or raised at earlier stages. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal for non-compliance with the stay order and the High Court&#039;s directive, reinforcing the importance of adhering to court orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124972</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>