<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 744 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124951</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit cannot be denied to a bona fide recipient of inputs where receipt under duty-referencing invoices is undisputed and the supplier&#039;s later failure to pay duty is the only objection. Rule 7(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 was read with the Board&#039;s circular to mean that no recovery should be made from a genuine user when the transaction itself is not doubted. Applying that principle, the Tribunal held the denial of credit was unjustified and upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2017 09:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 744 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124951</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit cannot be denied to a bona fide recipient of inputs where receipt under duty-referencing invoices is undisputed and the supplier&#039;s later failure to pay duty is the only objection. Rule 7(2) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 was read with the Board&#039;s circular to mean that no recovery should be made from a genuine user when the transaction itself is not doubted. Applying that principle, the Tribunal held the denial of credit was unjustified and upheld the assessee&#039;s entitlement to the credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>