<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 737 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124944</link>
    <description>Amended Modvat provisions and the Board circular required the department to verify the duty-paid character of the goods, receipt of inputs, and their use in manufacturing before denying credit on procedural defects in duty-paying documents. The circular also discouraged issuance of show cause notices for mere procedural lapses without such verification and called for pending matters to be disposed of accordingly. On that basis, denial of credit for the stated procedural deficiencies was not finally sustained, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication under the amended regime after hearing the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:27:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161878" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 737 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124944</link>
      <description>Amended Modvat provisions and the Board circular required the department to verify the duty-paid character of the goods, receipt of inputs, and their use in manufacturing before denying credit on procedural defects in duty-paying documents. The circular also discouraged issuance of show cause notices for mere procedural lapses without such verification and called for pending matters to be disposed of accordingly. On that basis, denial of credit for the stated procedural deficiencies was not finally sustained, and the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication under the amended regime after hearing the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>