https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124940 The Tribunal noted that all concerned appellants, including M/s. Sameer Industries, complied with the Tribunal's stay order by depositing the required amounts. Despite the Commissioner's application for dismissal of appeals due to non-compliance, the Tribunal rejected the application, emphasizing that the decision to dismiss appeals is based on the actual compliance status of the appellants rather than solely on the Commissioner's request. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering the appellants' compliance with stay orders in determining the outcome of the appeals. en-us Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:10:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124940 The Tribunal noted that all concerned appellants, including M/s. Sameer Industries, complied with the Tribunal's stay order by depositing the required amounts. Despite the Commissioner's application for dismissal of appeals due to non-compliance, the Tribunal rejected the application, emphasizing that the decision to dismiss appeals is based on the actual compliance status of the appellants rather than solely on the Commissioner's request. The judgment highlighted the importance of considering the appellants' compliance with stay orders in determining the outcome of the appeals. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124940