<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 730 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124917</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, emphasizing the necessity for the lower appellate authority to consider the material facts and provide the appellants with a fair hearing. The stay application for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of interest for delayed payment of differential duty was disposed of accordingly, recognizing the importance of due process and the right to be heard in reaching a final decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:13:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 730 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124917</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by way of remand, emphasizing the necessity for the lower appellate authority to consider the material facts and provide the appellants with a fair hearing. The stay application for waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery of interest for delayed payment of differential duty was disposed of accordingly, recognizing the importance of due process and the right to be heard in reaching a final decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124917</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>