<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 722 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124909</link>
    <description>The amended exemption notification was read as clarificatory because it retained the original entry for &quot;computers&quot; and merely added an explanation stating that computers include CPUs. On a prima facie view, the explanation was treated as relating back to the original notification rather than introducing a new restriction or benefit. That interpretation supported interim relief, and full waiver of pre-deposit was granted on the basis that the amendment could operate retrospectively for the dispute at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:23:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161845" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 722 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124909</link>
      <description>The amended exemption notification was read as clarificatory because it retained the original entry for &quot;computers&quot; and merely added an explanation stating that computers include CPUs. On a prima facie view, the explanation was treated as relating back to the original notification rather than introducing a new restriction or benefit. That interpretation supported interim relief, and full waiver of pre-deposit was granted on the basis that the amendment could operate retrospectively for the dispute at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>