https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124904 The appellants sought a stay and waiver of deposit against a demand and penalties for accessories sold separately from food processors. The dispute centered on whether assessment should be based on the ultimate MRP when sold together. The court found in favor of the appellants, noting that the items were cleared and sold separately, with no evidence of being sold together under one MRP. As a result, the court granted a waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalties under Section 35F, with recovery stayed pending appeal. en-us Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:52:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124904 The appellants sought a stay and waiver of deposit against a demand and penalties for accessories sold separately from food processors. The dispute centered on whether assessment should be based on the ultimate MRP when sold together. The court found in favor of the appellants, noting that the items were cleared and sold separately, with no evidence of being sold together under one MRP. As a result, the court granted a waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalties under Section 35F, with recovery stayed pending appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124904