<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 526 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124902</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, allowed stay petitions challenging penalties under Section 112 of the Customs Act for aiding and abetting in selling duty-free imported goods in the domestic market. The tribunal found a violation of natural justice principles and lack of jurisdiction by DGCEI officers in Bombay for importations at Surat, emphasizing the importance of proper notification to extend officers&#039; authority. The decision stressed the necessity of evidence to support penalties and highlighted the consequences of disregarding natural justice principles in customs cases. This judgment sets a precedent for similar cases involving customs violations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 18:48:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161838" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 526 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124902</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Ahmedabad, allowed stay petitions challenging penalties under Section 112 of the Customs Act for aiding and abetting in selling duty-free imported goods in the domestic market. The tribunal found a violation of natural justice principles and lack of jurisdiction by DGCEI officers in Bombay for importations at Surat, emphasizing the importance of proper notification to extend officers&#039; authority. The decision stressed the necessity of evidence to support penalties and highlighted the consequences of disregarding natural justice principles in customs cases. This judgment sets a precedent for similar cases involving customs violations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>