https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124891 The Tribunal found a violation of rules of natural justice by the Commissioner (Appeals) for rejecting an appeal solely based on the failure to comply with the pre-deposit requirement without considering the merits. Citing previous orders and stay orders, the Tribunal emphasized that the Commissioner should have considered the interim orders in related appeals before insisting on pre-deposit. The impugned order was set aside, directing the Commissioner to dispose of the matter without requiring any pre-deposit, allowing the appeal to proceed in favor of the appellant. en-us Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Oct 2012 17:58:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124891 The Tribunal found a violation of rules of natural justice by the Commissioner (Appeals) for rejecting an appeal solely based on the failure to comply with the pre-deposit requirement without considering the merits. Citing previous orders and stay orders, the Tribunal emphasized that the Commissioner should have considered the interim orders in related appeals before insisting on pre-deposit. The impugned order was set aside, directing the Commissioner to dispose of the matter without requiring any pre-deposit, allowing the appeal to proceed in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 19 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124891