<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 560 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124873</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, dismissed the appeals due to unsatisfactory explanation for delay in filing appeals after a partner&#039;s illness, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. The Tribunal upheld the demand of service tax, interest, and penalty on commission received for business auxiliary services rendered to BSNL, affirming the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:22:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 560 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124873</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai, dismissed the appeals due to unsatisfactory explanation for delay in filing appeals after a partner&#039;s illness, leading to the dismissal of the appeals. The Tribunal upheld the demand of service tax, interest, and penalty on commission received for business auxiliary services rendered to BSNL, affirming the Deputy Commissioner&#039;s orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>