<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (1) TMI 557 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124870</link>
    <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi involved a mis-sent consignment of diamonds and semi-precious stones declared as samples, leading to valuation discrepancies and confiscation. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the original authority&#039;s order and permitted re-export to the Japanese consignor. The Tribunal found that the matter should be remanded to the original authority for fresh consideration, allowing both parties to present their case. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aimed to ensure a fair reconsideration of the case without delving into the merits, ultimately remanding the case for a new decision by the original authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 16:15:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161808" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (1) TMI 557 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124870</link>
      <description>The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi involved a mis-sent consignment of diamonds and semi-precious stones declared as samples, leading to valuation discrepancies and confiscation. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the original authority&#039;s order and permitted re-export to the Japanese consignor. The Tribunal found that the matter should be remanded to the original authority for fresh consideration, allowing both parties to present their case. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aimed to ensure a fair reconsideration of the case without delving into the merits, ultimately remanding the case for a new decision by the original authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124870</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>