https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124869 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing a re-quantification exercise within the limitation period. The appellant's duty paid on branded goods was to be adjusted against the current demand, potentially neutralizing the duty liability. The decision emphasized the importance of considering duty payments on branded goods for exemption and the need to adhere to limitation periods for re-quantification exercises in cases involving small scale exemptions. en-us Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Aug 2017 09:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124869 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, directing a re-quantification exercise within the limitation period. The appellant's duty paid on branded goods was to be adjusted against the current demand, potentially neutralizing the duty liability. The decision emphasized the importance of considering duty payments on branded goods for exemption and the need to adhere to limitation periods for re-quantification exercises in cases involving small scale exemptions. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124869