https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124859 The appeal was made against the order-in-appeal that confirmed the demand for Cenvat credit and imposed a penalty on the appellant for allegedly wrongly taking credit on FRP door windows not used in manufacturing. The appellant had paid duty on the goods at a higher value when selling them, effectively reversing the credit. The court found no justification for further reversal of credit and penalty imposition, ruling in favor of the appellant. en-us Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Aug 2017 09:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124859 The appeal was made against the order-in-appeal that confirmed the demand for Cenvat credit and imposed a penalty on the appellant for allegedly wrongly taking credit on FRP door windows not used in manufacturing. The appellant had paid duty on the goods at a higher value when selling them, effectively reversing the credit. The court found no justification for further reversal of credit and penalty imposition, ruling in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 15 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124859