<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 469 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124856</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed by the Appellate Authority under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal held that since duty was promptly paid upon interception by Revenue Authorities and not at the time of removal, and no determination was made under Section 11A(2) of the Act, the penalty was not justified. The judgment emphasized that penalty liability arises only when duty is determined under Section 11A(2), thereby absolving the Appellant from any penalty obligations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:28:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 469 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124856</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed by the Appellate Authority under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The Tribunal held that since duty was promptly paid upon interception by Revenue Authorities and not at the time of removal, and no determination was made under Section 11A(2) of the Act, the penalty was not justified. The judgment emphasized that penalty liability arises only when duty is determined under Section 11A(2), thereby absolving the Appellant from any penalty obligations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>