<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 465 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124852</link>
    <description>Waste and scrap of polyethylene film used only as wrapping material for inputs and intermediate products was not liable to excise duty because the film was not used in any manufacturing process and the scrap did not arise from manufacture of any product. Mere commercial value on discard did not create duty liability. The scrap was therefore held not dutiable, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:05:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 465 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124852</link>
      <description>Waste and scrap of polyethylene film used only as wrapping material for inputs and intermediate products was not liable to excise duty because the film was not used in any manufacturing process and the scrap did not arise from manufacture of any product. Mere commercial value on discard did not create duty liability. The scrap was therefore held not dutiable, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>